> Well above average (2 years) a year past the vesting cliff This is sort of misleading. The 2 year quote often thrown around is a measure of the average tenur

> Well above average (2 years) a year past the vesting cliff This is sort of misleading. The 2 year quote often thrown around is a measure of the average tenure of current employees at the company, not a measure of the average tenure of people leaving. I like to note that a company with exponential growth (and all of the major tech firms, excepting perhaps microsoft since it's been around longer count here) can have a seemingly low tenure by that first metric even if no one has ever left the company.