> $2000/mo on databases is also nuts, unless you're storing hundreds of terabytes at high redundancy levels. What? 300TB at 0,20e /GB which would actually be q

> $2000/mo on databases is also nuts, unless you're storing hundreds of terabytes at high redundancy levels. What? 300TB at 0,20e /GB which would actually be quite cheap for fast storage at high redundancy would cost 60 000e / month.