4 ms·

Did you have the chance to try your setup on an M1? If it worked for your sister, although you seem to have way higher requirements, is there anything to say it

by hiq 6y ago

Did you have the chance to try your setup on an M1? If it worked for your sister, although you seem to have way higher requirements, is there anything to say it wouldn't work for you? I'm asking because I read a lot of comments when it was released that it just doesn't need as much RAM because $REASONS. I wouldn't put my money on this, but I'm curious if this assumption holds water now that people have had time to try it out. Edit: there are such comments further down the thread where it seems to still be a mystery: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26913643 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26913643 So I'd really like to know where this magic breaks down: if you're used to 128GB or RAM, will the M1 feel sluggish?

gambiting 6y ago
Well, 100% of my development tools are Windows only so I can't really give it a try, sorry :-)
dijit 6y ago
I doubt it's possible to try a AAA dev setup on OSX at all, and, for whatever it's worth 64G workstations were "hand-me-downs" at my previous gig (AAA gamedev), I doubt there's much magic that can make "64 gig is not nearly enough" go to "16G is fine"
- hiq 6y ago
  I also have doubts but that's what the marketing hype has been claiming for some time now, so I'm really curious about real-world experiences and where the hype breaks down. The debate is often "I need way more RAM!" vs "But this is a new paradigm and old constraints don't apply!". AAA gamedev might be the wrong demographic though, since it's mostly done on Windows (I think?).
ianai 6y ago
I'd suggest people just get the larger ram unless they're tight on budget. I know Apple's trying to argue otherwise and people will agree with them. But I can't hear it as anything other than thinking molded to fit a prior decision. For what it's worth, and not scientific, but reported "percent used" statistics seem to grow slower for the 16 gig models than the 8 gig models (from the smart utils).

by hiq 6y ago

gambiting 6y ago

Well, 100% of my development tools are Windows only so I can't really give it a try, sorry :-)

dijit 6y ago

I doubt it's possible to try a AAA dev setup on OSX at all, and, for whatever it's worth 64G workstations were "hand-me-downs" at my previous gig (AAA gamedev), I doubt there's much magic that can make "64 gig is not nearly enough" go to "16G is fine"

hiq 6y ago
I also have doubts but that's what the marketing hype has been claiming for some time now, so I'm really curious about real-world experiences and where the hype breaks down. The debate is often "I need way more RAM!" vs "But this is a new paradigm and old constraints don't apply!". AAA gamedev might be the wrong demographic though, since it's mostly done on Windows (I think?).

ianai 6y ago

I'd suggest people just get the larger ram unless they're tight on budget. I know Apple's trying to argue otherwise and people will agree with them. But I can't hear it as anything other than thinking molded to fit a prior decision. For what it's worth, and not scientific, but reported "percent used" statistics seem to grow slower for the 16 gig models than the 8 gig models (from the smart utils).