>They don't get to own 50% of another company because their company was delayed by a few months. I think they should get Mark's shares. It's not that their co

>They don't get to own 50% of another company because their company was delayed by a few months. I think they should get Mark's shares. It's not that their company was delayed a few months, it's that the founder of another company came in and sabotaged their company long enough to gain critical mass. In fact, I'm surprised what Mark's did isn't illegal.