4 ms·
The 2400G is a relatively low end part that is four generations old. In the past AMD did not release high end desktop APUs, preferring customers to buy CPUs + G
by Macha 6y ago
The 2400G is a relatively low end part that is four generations old. In the past AMD did not release high end desktop APUs, preferring customers to buy CPUs + GPUs. This is already announced to change with a 5700G being produced. https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-7-5700g https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-7-5700g - On paper this is a 5800H in a desktop form factor with a higher max TDP and higher clock speeds.
The 5800H gets 2.5x on cpu benchmark's rating vs the 2400G. This is composed of a 50% single core and 300% multi-core improvement.
2400G: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+2400G&id=3183 https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+2400G&i...
5800H: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+2400G&id=3183 https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+2400G&i...
- phkahler 6y ago>> The 5800H gets 2.5x on cpu benchmark's rating vs the 2400G. That's in large part because its 8 cores instead of 4. The test I ran makes good use of multicore, but going from 4 to 8 won't cut the time completely in half. I suspect the M1 will still beat it by a bit. I take back my comment on availability. We ideally need to compare things on the same process node to see which design team has done a better job ;-)
- Macha 6y agoThe M1 is also 8 cores and benefiting from that.