The question here isn't ownership, it's possession. > "Apple contends that '[n]o reasonable consumer would believe' that purchased content would remain on the

The question here isn't ownership, it's possession. > "Apple contends that '[n]o reasonable consumer would believe' that purchased content would remain on the iTunes platform indefinitely," writes [U.S. District Court Judge] Mendez. "But in common usage, the term 'buy' means to acquire possession over something. It seems plausible, at least at the motion to dismiss stage, that reasonable consumers would expect their access couldn’t be revoked." https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/apple-must-face-lawsuit-for-telling-consumers-they-can-buy-movies-tv-shows https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/apple-must-face-la...