4 ms·
I think the point is that it's not "supernatural". Conceptually you could implement it. The opening and closing involves zero work. In reality the work won't be
by junippor 5y ago
I think the point is that it's not "supernatural". Conceptually you could implement it. The opening and closing involves zero work. In reality the work won't be zero due to friction, but you can in principle at least approximate it really well.
- raducu 5y agoThe work will never be zero, and I have a hunch it could well be greater than your overall temperature gain. If the opening works on non-charged particles, it has to have mass and opening and closing it is not possible without work. The work might be tiny, but your temperature gain is probably event tinier. If the particle is charged, you don't need a physical gate, but you do work on the particle by exerting a force on it. You also somehow must detect the particle, and that also takes energy.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- FabHK 5y ago> If the opening works on non-charged particles, it has to have mass and opening and closing it is not possible without work. You could open the gate by pulling it up, which would require work, but you could recover the entire work by letting it sink down again. It has been shown that the solution was not the physical work of opening/closing the gate, but the work required in information processing, in particular deleting information.
- peteretep 5y ago> The opening and closing involves zero work Why?
- chriswarbo 5y agoIt can be done conservatively https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_force https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_force
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]