4 ms·
This is a bummer. As much as I love lichess, I think there's a beautiful array of opportunities of monetisation which I believe would be nothing short of wrong
by inferense 5y ago
This is a bummer. As much as I love lichess, I think there's a beautiful array of opportunities of monetisation which I believe would be nothing short of wrong incentives. Value-based monetisation (instead of restriction / ad based monetisation) might as well motivate the team to maximise that value for the user.
Just a couple of examples (for which I'd be actually willing to pay for)
1. Stockfish, server-side game analysis, learning from mistakes 2. Deep individual analysis based on XY games, practicing on weak spots, openings etc. with stockfish
3. Their practice library
Again, all of these are super valuable to those who want to take their game to the next level, don't see why anyone in that segment wouldn't pay for this. The "entertainment" feature of lichess which is the chess itself should be free indeed.
- thomasahle 5y ago> 1. Stockfish, server-side game analysis, learning from mistakes I'm not sure what you mean by 2 and 3, but lichess already has server side analysis. If it's just that you'd like to pay for it, you can set up donations. You can also contribute your own server to the analysis cluster. Lichess is a really inspiring project on how a free/open source software community can provide the same value based features that we normally assume can only be done by monetization.
- yesenadam 5y ago> beautiful array of opportunities of monetisation I think that's the first time I've seen "beautiful" and "monetisation" in the same phrase.