4 ms·

The reason I’ve felt a strong distaste for ads since being a teenager is that ultimately they rob me of, or try to mess with, my free choice

by jhrmnn 5y ago

blowski 5y ago
Almost all human interaction is in some way trying to persuade you to choose something that you might otherwise not. When I ask my wife "Shall we play a board game?" I'm in some way doing the same thing. That's not evil. Advertising is not inherently evil. When it becomes evil is when it intentionally tries to deceive us, capture and processe insane amounts of information about us, and influence the display of information for its own ends. If I did that to my wife, it wouldn't be OK.
- MauranKilom 5y ago
  Right, but the game theory there is pretty obvious: The better an ad is at "hacking" your mind and exploiting human characteristics, the more money it makes. Which naturally leads to this insane spiral of increasingly manipulative and insidious ads. If your single purpose in life was to play board games with your wife, you would probably also observe these tendencies in your questions.
  - skinkestek 5y ago
    > The better an ad is at "hacking" your mind and exploiting human characteristics, the more money it makes. The same can be said about any negotiation or even any interaction, can't it? Yet there are some people and some companies you like and some that you don't like. I've been a customer liaison at a place where the customer actively went out of their way to see our sales guy; yes, it cost them money but he'd get them a better deal the they could on their own or with any other vendor they knew. He'd actively reduce his sale if possible without even mentioning but the customer had been with us for years and had noticed the pattern. There's no reason why ads aren't a spectrum as well: I see nothing wrong with a link to "this is the gear that I use" on a clearly marked page as long as they actually use it. Or a couple of books. ("You must read these 30 books to be a successful <x>" is of course another thing entirely.)
- fnord123 5y ago
  >When it becomes evil is when it intentionally tries to deceive us, capture and processe insane amounts of information about us, and influence the display of information for its own ends. If I did that to my wife, it wouldn't be OK. No single snowflake is responsible for the avalanche. Even if a single ad is not inherently evil, in aggregate they have become a problem.
  - blowski 5y ago
    To stretch your analogy: 1. Not all snowflakes become avalanches. 2. If we didn't have snowflakes, we wouldn't have snow, and that would cause huge problems as well.
- johannes1234321 5y ago
  > Advertising is not inherently evil. Evil isn't an objective measure. However ads want to get some attention away from the content I care about to the ad. One can argue that the "classic" Google ad, where I search for a pan and Google showing me ads for shops selling pans serves my request, at the same time I can argue that I was looking for a somewhat objective (while that's a lie - the algorithm showing search results has some biases) listing, while I get the one paying most. In my judgment the ad is bad, but the attention it drags is my payment for the information.

The reason I’ve felt a strong distaste for ads since being a teenager is that ultimately they rob me of, or try to mess with, my free choice

by jhrmnn 5y ago

The reason I’ve felt a strong distaste for ads since being a teenager is that ultimately they rob me of, or try to mess with, my free choice

blowski 5y ago

Almost all human interaction is in some way trying to persuade you to choose something that you might otherwise not. When I ask my wife "Shall we play a board game?" I'm in some way doing the same thing. That's not evil. Advertising is not inherently evil. When it becomes evil is when it intentionally tries to deceive us, capture and processe insane amounts of information about us, and influence the display of information for its own ends. If I did that to my wife, it wouldn't be OK.

MauranKilom 5y ago
Right, but the game theory there is pretty obvious: The better an ad is at "hacking" your mind and exploiting human characteristics, the more money it makes. Which naturally leads to this insane spiral of increasingly manipulative and insidious ads. If your single purpose in life was to play board games with your wife, you would probably also observe these tendencies in your questions.
- skinkestek 5y ago
  > The better an ad is at "hacking" your mind and exploiting human characteristics, the more money it makes. The same can be said about any negotiation or even any interaction, can't it? Yet there are some people and some companies you like and some that you don't like. I've been a customer liaison at a place where the customer actively went out of their way to see our sales guy; yes, it cost them money but he'd get them a better deal the they could on their own or with any other vendor they knew. He'd actively reduce his sale if possible without even mentioning but the customer had been with us for years and had noticed the pattern. There's no reason why ads aren't a spectrum as well: I see nothing wrong with a link to "this is the gear that I use" on a clearly marked page as long as they actually use it. Or a couple of books. ("You must read these 30 books to be a successful <x>" is of course another thing entirely.)
fnord123 5y ago
>When it becomes evil is when it intentionally tries to deceive us, capture and processe insane amounts of information about us, and influence the display of information for its own ends. If I did that to my wife, it wouldn't be OK. No single snowflake is responsible for the avalanche. Even if a single ad is not inherently evil, in aggregate they have become a problem.
- blowski 5y ago
  To stretch your analogy: 1. Not all snowflakes become avalanches. 2. If we didn't have snowflakes, we wouldn't have snow, and that would cause huge problems as well.
johannes1234321 5y ago
> Advertising is not inherently evil. Evil isn't an objective measure. However ads want to get some attention away from the content I care about to the ad. One can argue that the "classic" Google ad, where I search for a pan and Google showing me ads for shops selling pans serves my request, at the same time I can argue that I was looking for a somewhat objective (while that's a lie - the algorithm showing search results has some biases) listing, while I get the one paying most. In my judgment the ad is bad, but the attention it drags is my payment for the information.