3 ms·
In all seriousness, it’s an odd feeling one gets when writing fiction. Is the author morally responsible for the actions of his characters? In reality, Gandalf
by lurquer 5y ago
In all seriousness, it’s an odd feeling one gets when writing fiction. Is the author morally responsible for the actions of his characters? In reality, Gandalf isn’t killing orcs... there are no orcs and there is no Gandalf and it’s just a bunch of ink on a piece of paper.
I write fiction occasionally. When wondering if it’s ‘moral’ or ‘ethical’ for a character to do something repugnant, I often have to remind myself that none of it is real!
The ‘moral’ issue — if there is one — I suppose pertains to the author deliberately holding an immoral character up as an example of good behavior in the ‘real’ world. Maybe even then there is no real moral issue...
- dudul 5y agoThis has nothing to do with being real or not. An author should write consistent characters. Characters who follow their own morale and ethic. An author is not their characters. Considering that an author is responsible for the morale of their characters is how we end up with boring Marie sues in media.
- lurquer 5y agoYou may have missed my point... I was simply observing that it is difficult, as an author, not to feel queasy about writing a character who commits immoral acts.