4 ms·
You're under the mistaken impression that the original work was used to create the new album cover. That's not the case; the Kind of Bloop cover was a completel
by jeffreymcmanus 15y ago
You're under the mistaken impression that the original work was used to create the new album cover. That's not the case; the Kind of Bloop cover was a completely new work that happened to look like the original. If it's possible for anyone to file a lawsuit because a given work looks similar to another work, then jeebus help us all.
- gallerytungsten 15y agoApparently you're no longer confused regarding the "moral right of the artist" being vague. Regarding your claim that the original work wasn't used, I think this quote from the article is pretty clear: "Before the project launched, I knew exactly what I wanted for the cover — a pixel art recreation of the original album cover..." This wasn't a case of happenstance, as you suggest.