3 ms·
I don't know why they didn't just pass it over to WikiLeaks. They've been through that problem already, and have a process in place to delete that sort of stuf
by lallysingh 15y ago
I don't know why they didn't just pass it over to WikiLeaks. They've been through that problem already, and have a process in place to delete that sort of stuff.
- krashidov 15y agoLulzsec has had a history of defending WL (PBS hack for Bradley Manning), but I don't know if they are willing to give them this data as it might shine the spotlight away from Lulzsec.
- redthrowaway 15y ago1) They clearly don't care about collateral damage, and 2) WL still isn't accepting submissions until DDB hands back their database.
- lhnz 15y agoDDB? I've not heard of this.
- redthrowaway 15y agoDaniel Domscheit-Berg. A quick intro to the submission issue can be found here: http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011/02/09/wikileaks-fires-back-at-defector-over-book-claims/ http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011/02/09/wikileaks-f...
- Sundog 15y agoProbably because Wikileaks' owner is a bit of an egomaniacal douche