3 ms·
> It could just be a clever attempt at socially engineering the public opinion of Cellebrite. If so, that sounds potentially libelous (IANAL).
by cronix 6y ago
> It could just be a clever attempt at socially engineering the public opinion of Cellebrite.
If so, that sounds potentially libelous (IANAL).
- tediousdemise 6y agoIndeed. This whole effort was done out of retaliation and spite, so I wouldn’t put libel beneath them either.
- Y_Y 6y agoIt's not libel if you can prove it's true.
- tediousdemise 6y agoIf Signal cannot prove the vulnerability is real, which they contemptuously refuse to do in blog post, then it stands as libel.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- anonAndOn 6y agoEven if that were true, those trade secrets will never be defended in open court. The best Cellebrite can do here is a PR campaign to downplay the veracity of this. "There's nothing to see here, folks!"