It says so much about TechCrunch that they're so easily impressed by flashy crap like this. The same kind of fawning occurred over that stupid site Qwiki that r

It says so much about TechCrunch that they're so easily impressed by flashy crap like this. The same kind of fawning occurred over that stupid site Qwiki that reads Wikipedia to you using text-to-speech while showing a Flickr slideshow. Just because something would look cool in a movie doesn't mean it "revolutionary" in the real world. Imagine a tech blog written by technologists...