3 ms·
my thoughts exactly. No rythm, nothing fascinating. Looks like her "big name" is result of good connections in proper circles.
by lovelyviking 6y ago
my thoughts exactly. No rythm, nothing fascinating. Looks like her "big name" is result of good connections in proper circles.
- yostrovs 6y agoMost of art seems to have gone this way. Contemporary art museums are full of random nonsense few people find any pleasure in, anything to be curious about, or anything to become excited by. So much architecture is just ugly, like some kind of experiments gone bad. It's pretty depressing that people accept that there's something there, while they themselves can't see it. They trust the experts, be it experts in architecture, art, or poetry. The result is crap that can't hold up to stuff created 300 years ago, but that still gets recognized as work if genius. Example: Beeple's art has sold for more than any Rafael.