5 ms·
> I like the AGPL, but I would like an extra step that forces you to distribute code even you have not modified it. This is...already the case. The distributor
by jblwps 5y ago
> I like the AGPL, but I would like an extra step that forces you to distribute code even you have not modified it.
This is...already the case. The distributor is the one who is bound to supply the source code--"upstream" isn't implicated in the license.
- dec0dedab0de 5y agoI didn't see your reply until just now, but the AGPL does not require you to redistribute source code to network users if it is not modified. The following stack exchange question has quotes from the fsf https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/650/do-i-have-to-offer-the-source-of-an-agpl-v3-0-licensed-web-app-even-if-i-didn https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/650/do-i-have...