Really? http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2Fyes1.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=HTML5&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validato

Really? http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2Fyes1.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=HTML5&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.2 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2... http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2Fyes2.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=HTML5&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.2 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2... http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2Fyes3.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.2 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2... Dang, apparently so. Guess I was wrong. The world's most inane objection: If you force the validator to HTML5 mode, (as in the first and second links) then you don't need to declare a DOCTYPE, a savings of 16 bytes. Not that you would ever do that for a real document, since it's a dumb idea.