3 ms·

It would appear that it's already in use in Europe and has win in court. https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Rb._Amsterdam_-_C/13/684665_/_KG_ZA_20-481 https://

It would appear that it's already in use in Europe and has win in court. https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Rb._Amsterdam_-_C/13/684665_/_KG_ZA_20-481 https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Rb._Amsterdam_-_C/13/6846... > The Amsterdam Court of First Instance rejected the request by student representatives and an individual student for a preliminary injunction against the use of digital surveillance software for exams by a public university. The court ruled that measures against covid-19 did not allow for a suitable alternative and the processing could therefore be based on Article 6(1)(e) GDPR.

Hiopl 6y ago
I don't understand how that passed. > (e) processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller; What's the point of GDPR if you can side-step it in this way?
iforgotpassword 6y ago
The Netherlands seem to really embrace these platforms. I think for example Chromebook based exams have been big there for quite some years now while it's almost unheard of in Germany.