3 ms·
This seems like exactly what happened to me. I do still think the researcher should have gotten approval from maintainers or the foundation before going ahead,
by kapp_in_life 6y ago
This seems like exactly what happened to me. I do still think the researcher should have gotten approval from maintainers or the foundation before going ahead, and the way he did the research was pretty shitty.
But you also forgot the part where Greg throws a hissy fit and decides to revert every commit from umn emails, including 3+year old commits that legitimately fix security vulns.[0] Great job keeping mainline bug free with your paranoid witchhunt!
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c9318a3e0218bc9dacc25be46b9eec363259536f https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin...
- db48x 6y agoThat one has already been vouched for; I doubt it will actually be reverted: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b27a43bb-36bc-4b9-42de-c39a5b68f96f@namei.org/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b27a43bb-36bc-4b9-42de-c39a5b68... If you know of any others that shouldn’t be reverted, you should email the list and point them out.