3 ms·
I'm much more interested in ReScript[0] than TypeScript, but I guess that TypeScript is much more appealing to C# programmers and much more supported as a whole
by haolez 6y ago
I'm much more interested in ReScript[0] than TypeScript, but I guess that TypeScript is much more appealing to C# programmers and much more supported as a whole.
Anyone here has some experience with ReScript (or ReasonML, for what it matters) to share with the rest of us?
[0] https://rescript-lang.org/ https://rescript-lang.org/
- hermanradtke 6y agoIt has been a while, but BuckleScript is the pain point. TypeScript is much easier to use within the existing JS ecosystem.
- chrysoprace 6y agoFor me, the consistency with JavaScript's existing syntax is a great advantage of TypeScript. TypeScript's "allowJs" flag also makes it easier to convert an existing codebase. ReScript seems to have come a long way since I last looked at it (it was just called ReasonML at the time I think), so it'd be worth looking into.