It seems like this library was built to address the edge cases the author is familiar with, and for the more complicated actions it starts leaning closer toward

It seems like this library was built to address the edge cases the author is familiar with, and for the more complicated actions it starts leaning closer towards a traditional language. For example, the debounce function referenced in the JS comparison isn't even a properly implemented debounce, which means his built-in language function for debounce is incorrect. I've had to build or use a debounce function maybe 10 times in 12 years personally.