2 ms·
> WPF also lacks High DPI WPF is system-DPI aware but it's not aware of per-monitor DPI as that feature didn't exist at all when WPF was conceived. I guess th
by wvenable 6y ago
> WPF also lacks High DPI
WPF is system-DPI aware but it's not aware of per-monitor DPI as that feature didn't exist at all when WPF was conceived. I guess these days Microsoft doesn't consider that good enough to be called High DPI aware.
> I've just been looking at the charts like that, and my ultimate answer is "???"
I don't know -- I guess find it much less difficult than picking a web framework. The problem is that GUI frameworks (in any platform) are a complex mix of trade-offs. .NET and Windows is not the unique in this regard.
> The high rate of churn in the MS ecosystem can be blamed on MS.
I'm not sure you can call frameworks that have been around for multiple-decades a high rate of churn. The problems that Microsoft have is no different any of other platforms you've discussed. Yes, it's one organization but the problems are all the same. New developments require new framework but developers have lots of existing code. The fact that Winforms still exists is the same reason jQuery still exists.
Microsoft wanted everyone to move over to UWP -- this is kind of exactly what you're suggesting -- but developers just weren't interested. So they had to go back and take a more broad approach. But UWP is/was supposed to be the future.
> it's quite clearly a result of constantly changing vision of how the .NET ecosystem should look like
Not just the .NET ecosystem but the broader software industry as well. Many of the changes that Microsoft is making to .NET relate to changes made in mobile and on the web. As the world changes, .NET changes, and thus Microsoft maybe adds a new GUI framework to fit that world. Without that sort of change, we'd all still be using Winforms.
But I don't disagree. Microsoft has been in a long transition period to .NET core and they're finally started to come out the other side. With that done, there will be renewed effort to bring everything else together as well. I suspect in another couple of years this mess will be a lot more cleaned up. But I expect, unlike with other platforms, that most of my code written today will still work with whatever Microsoft comes up with in the future.