The article says he started the lease in June 2019, 22 months ago. That means that $160,000 of his spend is rent. I would lay a lot of the blame for this at the

The article says he started the lease in June 2019, 22 months ago. That means that $160,000 of his spend is rent. I would lay a lot of the blame for this at the feet of the landlord, who had someone who would renovate their building and increase its value but instead drained all their capital and ruined the venture. Is 22 months too long? Totally. Unbelievably. Though I'm not sure I feel any of the steps listed in the article are inappropriate. The last 12 of those 22 months have been in a pandemic and I'm sure things have slowed. I guess what I'm trying to say is this seems like a poor example to use in judging the system. The landlord has so clearly done most of the damage in this instance.