4 ms·
This is something I have personally looked at as an owner of a UFED touch device (1st gen). By default your software runs in a non-priviledged account but who's
by WrtCdEvrydy 6y ago
This is something I have personally looked at as an owner of a UFED touch device (1st gen). By default your software runs in a non-priviledged account but who's to say one of files isn't just straight up being read by FFMPEG and adding or removing evidence from the final report.
The official Cellebrite policy has always been "don't worry, if you get stuck, we can send you an expert to testify to the reliability of the scientific evidence due to previous cases" but what happens when the pyramid of previous cases fall apart? Do you suddenly own a paperweight?
I've also published papers (with NIST's help) on using consumer grade hardware for forensics and why testing your tools across a wide variety of scenarios is critical.
- tediousdemise 6y ago> As just one example (unrelated to what follows), their software bundles FFmpeg DLLs that were built in 2012 and have not been updated since then. This purported vulnerability does not rely on FFmpeg, hence the disclaimer.