> This is akin to a thought terminating cliche. I disagree, because you trimmed to me the most important part " none of them are actionable". I find these con

> This is akin to a thought terminating cliche. I disagree, because you trimmed to me the most important part " none of them are actionable". I find these conversations interesting and sometimes educational, which is great. But the hard part of such a change is generally not technological, so when it evolves hand-waving about potential future technologies and then tweaks to them rapidly becomes less interesting because it avoids the core of the problems. Technological discussion involving mechanisms to discuss evaluating/exchanging/etc. property right that does not at least try address the fundamental practical sources and control mechanisms of those rights seems doomed to be superficial.