3 ms·
I actually believe the contrary to be true: if most people were given well-fitting masks that effectively filtered the air, mask adoption wold be much lower. B
by semi-extrinsic 6y ago
I actually believe the contrary to be true: if most people were given well-fitting masks that effectively filtered the air, mask adoption wold be much lower.
Because wearing a properly fitted mask that actually filters the air you breath in and out is extremely discomforting after about half an hour. I've used well-fitted 3M 6500 masks a lot for working with nasty glues etc. Those only filter the air you inhale, and have a very broad silicone lip to distribute the sealing pressure. Still it's a lot more uncomfortable than any of the usual Covid face masks I've tried.
I believe the two largest benefits of mask wearing as currently implemented is catchment of ballistically travelling saliva from sick individuals, and reduction of hand-face contact in all individuals. And for those two, filtration efficiency is irrelevant.
- mindslight 6y agoIMO the 7500's are more comfortable than the simple medical masks that pull on your ears, or simple N95's that squish your head. But I wouldn't want to wear mine for a long shift, because it gets a bit stuffy having removed the check valves. Also, half face respirators get much lighter and easier to breathe when you swap out the chemical cartridges for P100-only puffball filters (eg 2297). I'm looking forward to seeing how the sleek fabric ones feel, after the pandemic is over and I just need to thwart surveillance cameras.