4 ms·
The nice thing is that they don't even need to acquire them, both product are open-source. AWS already has CodeCommit so I wouldn't be surprised if they came up
by rakoo 6y ago
The nice thing is that they don't even need to acquire them, both product are open-source. AWS already has CodeCommit so I wouldn't be surprised if they came up with some integrated CI/CD that automatically builds all of your code and deploys to autoscaled EC2/Lambda instances. Indeed, close the gap with the editor (or some hybrid process) and you can have your own Google's dev infrastructure (https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2016/7/204032-why-google-stores-billions-of-lines-of-code-in-a-single-repository/fulltext https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2016/7/204032-why-google-stor...).
Imagine you browse the AWS public hosting repo, you click "fork" and are immediately brought into a web-based IDE, you share the url with a friend who comes and joins you for some extreme programming, every change gets built on AWS and unit tests are run automatically and the result is shown in a background tab, you click on "commit" and the code (that was already tested) is instantaneously deployed on instances that have been automagically sized, and after 10 mins of cooking you get an URL with your service in production.
There's a real risk of lock-in but I'd love to have that experience. It could also help bring more people into programming and dissolve the "magicness" of it
- dragonwriter 6y ago> AWS already has CodeCommit so I wouldn't be surprised if they came up with some integrated CI/CD AWS CodePipeline > that automatically builds all of your code AWS CodeBuild > and deploys to autoscaled EC2/Lambda instances AWS CodeDeploy Yeah, they might come up with that someday... oh, and: > Indeed, close the gap with the editor That whole stack already has available integrations with AWS Cloud9.
- rakoo 6y agoI am definitely not up-to-date with all AWS products, that definitely sounds like the ideal infrastructure. Do you have any feedback on using it ?