But it is juvenile hijinks, and did turn out to be patently false. > The NY Times headline includes relevant details to inform the reader. Lets see which deta

But it is juvenile hijinks, and did turn out to be patently false. > The NY Times headline includes relevant details to inform the reader. Lets see which details were no longer relevant once the story turned out to be false, and the Times (to their credit, unlike the Mail) changed the headline to reflect that: Update: Virginia Girl Recants Story of Assault, and Family Apologizes - https://web.archive.org/web/20191001003852/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/us/dreadlocks-cut-off-immanuel-christian-school.html https://web.archive.org/web/20191001003852/https://www.nytim...