3 ms·

I get where you're coming from, but I disagree. They actually prey on seemingly small changes that have large "unintended"/non-obvious side-effects. I argue tha

I get where you're coming from, but I disagree. They actually prey on seemingly small changes that have large "unintended"/non-obvious side-effects. I argue that finding such situations is much much harder in Rust than in C. Is it impossible? Probably not (especially not in unsafe code), but I do believe it limits the attack surface quite a lot. Rust is not a definitive solution, but it can be a (big) part of the solution.

metalliqaz 6y ago
yes it definitely limits the attack surface. remember that in systems programming there are bugs that cause errors in computation, which Rust is pretty good at protecting; but there are also bugs which cause unintended behaviors, usually from incorrect or incomplete requirements, or implementation edge cases.