4 ms·
Wouldn't that draw more attention to the research patches, compared to a "normal" lkml patch? If you (as a maintainer) expected the patch to be malicious, would
by scaladev 5y ago
Wouldn't that draw more attention to the research patches, compared to a "normal" lkml patch? If you (as a maintainer) expected the patch to be malicious, wouldn't you be extra careful in reviewing it?
- Dobbs 5y agoYou don't have to say you are studying the security implications, you could be say you are studying something else like turn around time for patches, or level of critique, or any number of things.
- colechristensen 5y agoYes you do. In no circumstances is it ethical to do penetrating tests without approval.
- joshuamorton 5y agoIn the thread you're in, the assumption is that the patches are never actually submitted.
- aflag 5y agoYou probably can learn more and faster about new drugs by testing them in humans rather than rats. However, science is not above ethics. That is a lesson history has taught us in the most unpleasant of ways.