3 ms·
>That only makes sense if you agree with the open source foundation definition of restrictive. I think Timescale employees should remember to preface "This is
by DetroitThrow 5y ago
>That only makes sense if you agree with the open source foundation definition of restrictive.
I think Timescale employees should remember to preface "This is our belief on the definition of restrictive" when describing the license as more open than open source licenses, given much of the community might disagree (sometimes vehemently) about that take.
- detaro 5y agoOr scope it as "less restrictive for most users" or something along those lines.
- cevian 5y agoThat may indeed have been more accurate. But this is a HN comment thread after all, we can't capture all subtleties of a very complex debate. :)
- akulkarni 5y agoTotally fair. My initial comment was a little rushed. :-)