5 ms·
> It's a fucking war there, people are sent to war to kill and to get killed. For me it is "here". The fact that for you it is "there" makes me think that you
by caskstrength 6y ago
> It's a fucking war there, people are sent to war to kill and to get killed.
For me it is "here". The fact that for you it is "there" makes me think that you should talk more to actual people that are living in the countries you mentioned in previous post instead of lecturing them over internet with copy/paste of Russian propaganda "news" pieces.
Besides, it might be a novel concept for you, but here we have an actual elections. People can always vote for some Russian puppet (Medvedchuk, for example) and "join" Russia. I guess majority thinks that "fucking war" is better alternative in this situation.
> GDP in Ukraine is ~3,5k$ per year.
Your point being? It is not like Ukraine was some rich local Eastern European Switzerland until sneaky CIA/Soros sponsored NGOs "destabilized" it.
> Your software developer friends are just outliers there.
Are you intentionally omitting my next sentence?
- levosmetalo 6y ago> For me it is "here". The fact that for you it is "there" Sure, and I know some people for whom it was also "here" and now it's "there" because they can't live any more in their hometown because of war. For you guys "here" in Kiev Donbas is also "there". > Besides, it might be a novel concept for you, but here we have an actual elections. People can always vote for some Russian puppet (Medvedchuk, for example) and "join" Russia. I guess majority thinks that "fucking war" is better alternative in this situation. And that's why Ukraine will never be a prosperous country, as long as you consider a "fucking war" a better alternative to anything. The majority has been brainwashed by "western" propaganda to hate everything Russian, to the point it would rather have "fucking war" against their ex citizen in Donbas and Crimea instead of letting them choose where and how they want to live. Those guys in Donbas and Crimea also had elections and referendums, not worse than those in Ukraine, and they decided they don't want to live with someone who is denying them basic human rights based on the wrong ethnicity. Would you rather kill them all than let them go? And since you want to kill all the ethnic Russians why are you surprised that Russia won't let you do it? NATO is happy to have war against Russia or Russian allies to the last Ukrainian solder and civilian.
- minipci1321 6y ago> NATO is happy to have war against Russia or Russian allies to the last Ukrainian solder and civilian. I think this devalues your all other arguments. Where it comes from?
- sergeykish 5y agoThat's Russian propaganda. There is no independent TV in Russian Federation for 20 years. State controlled media spreads all possible lies. Everything to distract from internal problems. Right now state breaks down peaceful protests, 1600 detained, each is fined by about $200, that's almost half of the average wage ($500). Opposition leader in jail by fabricated claim, requires medical help, poisoned previous year. Income is falling, retirement age increased. State leaders are corrupt beyond possible.
- caskstrength 6y ago> Sure, and I know some people for whom it was also "here" and now it's "there" because they can't live any more in their hometown because of war. I also hope that Russia withdraws their military and financial support for terrorists who prevent your friend from going home. However, it seems Russia wants further confrontation and is now amassing significant military presence in that region, so we won't have much choice in that matter. > For you guys "here" in Kiev Donbas is also "there". Not really. For most of the people in other parts of Ukraine who are under constant risk of being conscripted the Donbas is very much "here". > And that's why Ukraine will never be a prosperous country, as long as you consider a "fucking war" a better alternative to anything. Commendable sentiment. I would also prefer a peaceful world for all of us. > The majority has been brainwashed by "western" propaganda to hate everything Russian I'm a Russian speaker with some Russian ancestry. Please tell me more how I "hate everything Russian". > to the point it would rather have "fucking war" against their ex citizen in Donbas and Crimea instead of letting them choose where and how they want to live. There is no Iron Curtain anymore. People who want to live in any other country (including Russia) are obviously free to do so. > Those guys in Donbas and Crimea also had elections and referendums, not worse than those in Ukraine They are not recognized intentionally and and were conducted by occupying military personnel. Overall, we both know that "our town votes to join another country" is not how it works anywhere. Just ask Chechen people how it went for them, if you would like to know how Russia deals with such issues. > they decided they don't want to live with someone who is denying them basic human rights based on the wrong ethnicity This is just old Russian propaganda trope "Bloodthirsty Ukrainian Nazis want to genocide Russian-speaking people". Overall, I never felt that my rights were denied to me due to language of choice or my obviously Russian surname. > Would you rather kill them all than let them go? Have you stopped beating your wife? > And since you want to kill all the ethnic Russians why are you surprised that Russia won't let you do it? So you started your message with incredibly pacifist statement "will never be a prosperous country, as long as you consider a "fucking war" a better alternative to anything" and end it with approving of Russian aggression under flimsy pretext that they are preventing some imagined genocide of ethnic Russians? I sense double standards here. > NATO is happy to have war against Russia or Russian allies to the last Ukrainian solder and civilian. This is factually incorrect. Obama repeatedly denied lethal weapon sales to Ukraine during active phase of the conflict [1]. The main objective for European politicians also seems to be some fake outrage about Russia's actions to put a show for their electorate while continuing business as usual behind closed doors [2]. If anything, "NATO" would happily give whole Ukrainian territory to Russia in order to end costly sanctions, if they could somehow manage to do so without war, refugees and overall humanitarian disaster (with obvious exception of Poland and Baltic states who are fully aware that they could be next). [1] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31013452 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31013452 [2] https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-joe-biden-nord-stream-2/ https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-joe-biden-nord...
- andonceagain 6y agoI envy your tenacity fighting against ill-intentioned HNers. I was born in one of those countries mentioned by @levosmetalo above and the common running joke was too "People in internet say revolution is sponsored by CIA, but I'm still waiting for my paycheck!" and that was coming from people that were _truly_ putting themselves out there. Anyway, I don't care (sadly) for having an identity on HN anymore, several times I created a user in good faith only to be downvoted to oblivion discussing these matters. Yes, I know, I shouldn't be commenting on those threads. I can't help it, I grew up in a place awfully destroyed by communist.
- chupasaurus 6y agoThe joke is very alive in Russia.