3 ms·
Thanks for the feedback. I'm actually both happy and sad that the weighting of trees puts you off a little. Happy because it shows you know and value the activ
by kisamoto 6y ago
Thanks for the feedback.
I'm actually both happy and sad that the weighting of trees puts you off a little. Happy because it shows you know and value the active carbon removal, sad that you're a little deterred from using the product.
We did initially start with a much higher weighting towards Climeworks & Charm however the high costs were not gratefully received hence why we do add a stronger weighting to cheaper forestation. To give you an idea, without forestation (and an equal split between Climeworks, Charm and Greensand) the 500kg/month plan would be $500-600/month...
Our subscriber base is growing 1-5 subscribers each month and we're seeing a growing interest as people look for alternatives to carbon credits. At the moment neither founder takes a salary as all money is reinvested into developing the product, educating on carbon removal and spreading the word.
Thank you for the heads up on the transparency sheet. We recently shuffled things about and I had not noticed them, I shall fix them today.
If you are interested in purchasing a custom plan please feel free to email me your requirements and I shall get back to you with a price.
- curl-up 6y agoSorry if I'm missing something obvious here. You say that, without forestation, cost would be ~$1k per tonne. From the article, Stripe paid $600 per tonne. Where is this difference coming from? Did they get a 40% discount from Charm?
- Bedon292 6y agoI believe that is averaged across the other three methods? If you get the subscription from Climeworks its $1200 for 1100kg. And I do assume Stripe got a first mover / bulk discount. Although greensand looks like its only $50 per ton, so maybe that is not included in the the average.