> Nope, the list is implying that "here is a resource of tooling built for JS but NOT made in JS", [...] So the list is indeed arbitrary. > I think the motiva

> Nope, the list is implying that "here is a resource of tooling built for JS but NOT made in JS", [...] So the list is indeed arbitrary. > I think the motivation is to show that just because you want to write a tool for the JS ecosystem, you don't have to use JS if you don't want to. No one ever said you had to.