4 ms·
> My preferred licensing arrangement (for server software) would be something like AGPL + non-profit Sounds like the Non-Profit OSL 3.0: https://opensource.org
by pritambaral 6y ago
> My preferred licensing arrangement (for server software) would be something like AGPL + non-profit
Sounds like the Non-Profit OSL 3.0: https://opensource.org/licenses/NPOSL-3.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/NPOSL-3.0
- bscphil 6y agoInteresting license, I hadn't seen it before. GNU complains about the following provision: > If You distribute or communicate copies of the Original Work or a Derivative Work, You must make a reasonable effort under the circumstances to obtain the express assent of recipients to the terms of this License. This does seem pretty sketchy because I don't know what counts as a reasonable effort. GNU suggests that placing the software in publicly accessible version control or on an FTP server might be in violation of the license because it would allow recipients of your copies to obtain the software without providing "express consent" to the license terms. I think this is a bad requirement.