> Always requiring the modified code be available would make it a license violation to download an AGPL work, change one file, and then delete it because you're

> Always requiring the modified code be available would make it a license violation to download an AGPL work, change one file, and then delete it because you're bored. Imho the reasonable way to make it work is this: Assume Alice writes an AGPL software, Bob makes a modification and sends it to Claire, and Claire then uses it to host a blog, and David then reads the blog. Then Claire should be required to tell David where the source can be found, either by referring him to Bob's repo, or to a repo she herself hosts.