3 ms·
Yes, absolutely. In photography circles the iPad Pro is regarded as an amazing device that offers performance and color quality that you won't be able to achiev
by camillomiller 6y ago
Yes, absolutely. In photography circles the iPad Pro is regarded as an amazing device that offers performance and color quality that you won't be able to achieve even with expensive desktop monitors. Also, for the professional photographer, whose average rig is probably worth at least 20 to 50k depending on what they do, a 2000$ tablet with these characteristics is a steal.
- Applejinx 6y agoWell, now, that's interesting. I legitimately did not know that, even though I own three Blackmagic PCC4k video cameras and take quite an interest in 'playback technology', whether audio or imagery. I do know that my horrifyingly over-expensive iMac Pro has a good screen, but not Pro Display XDR good. I'd assumed the iPads were basically consumer grade. So the iPad Pro actually does make sense for color timing and proofs and working in DaVinci Resolve etc? If the display is relevant for this, damn straight giving it a good CPU is going to matter. People are going to be doing serious video color correction work on these things. I certainly won't… but it's going to start looking very compelling for that audience.
- breakfastduck 6y agoThe screen is honestly amazing. Puts everything else in its field (and most pc / laptop monitors) to shame.
- arvinsim 6y agoThat was before the M1 laptops. I would say that most desktop users would be better served keeping their workflow than moving to a tablet workflow.