5 ms·
Discord needs threads before I would even consider using it as a slack replacement.
by __turbobrew__ 6y ago
Discord needs threads before I would even consider using it as a slack replacement.
- ilrwbwrkhv 6y agoThreads and the also send to channel are such a hack. It's much better to let conversations flow naturally.
- Mehdi2277 6y agoThere are many work conversations I have that rely heavily on threads and make the channel useless to scroll if sent directly. I think most of the discussions I read are in threads as often one engineer will encounter a bug, ask for help, and then there will be a back and forth discussion over a thread figuring the issue out. Keeping that in the channel makes reading the channel later fairly useless as most of that detailed discussion is too specific to care about. But being able to skim the main messages and see if anyone had similar issues and then enter that thread is great. On call alerts have a channel and then resolving the alert is often a thread discussion.
- lanstin 6y agoIt makes a hard ceiling as to how much volume one channel can tolerate. It also forces the conversations to be more sync instead of async, which has a high cost in terms of being able to ignore it for a while.
- hyperbovine 6y agoI’m absolutely loving that this comment is three threads deep.