> Owning a home as a form of wealth necessarily conflict with affordability. It's impossible for a home to not be wealth, unless somehow infinite houses could

> Owning a home as a form of wealth necessarily conflict with affordability. It's impossible for a home to not be wealth, unless somehow infinite houses could be built for free. So an argument can be had on how much wealth it should be and who gets to define that, but it is inescapable that it has some value.