11 ms·
I would say spend the money on teleportation using entanglement. That would probably produce results faster then trying to move a large mass from one side of th
by DonnyV 15y ago
I would say spend the money on teleportation using entanglement. That would probably produce results faster then trying to move a large mass from one side of the universe to the other.
- wunderfool 15y agoare you volunteering to be the first human test subject?
- weavejester 15y agoQuantum teleportation doesn't solve the problem of having to send mass across the universe.
- DonnyV 15y agoReally...whats cheaper and easier to build. A ship to keep people alive for 50yrs or tiny cargo ship to send the other side of the teleporter?
- bellaire 15y agoBuild me a quantum teleporter, then we can compare masses.
- pavel_lishin 15y agoI guess we'll find out when we build one of each. Until then, it's like asking what's easier to build, a heavier-than-air flying vessel, or a magic carpet?
- weavejester 15y agoIt would be a lot less work to convert the people into software, and then transmit them via a normal laser beam to a receiving station.