3 ms·
> I am pretty sure this is purely because they couldn't fit the port in the device itself, but I like the idea. There is a design consideration of not having y
by Pet_Ant 6y ago
> I am pretty sure this is purely because they couldn't fit the port in the device itself, but I like the idea.
There is a design consideration of not having yet another cable going up to the desk.
- Cu3PO42 6y agoSure, and that's exactly why I want this. But with the same argument they could have put USB-C or even USB-A ports on the brick for permanently connected peripherals, but they didn't. I understand it would be almost impossible for Thunderbolt due to concerns with signal integrity, but normal USB should work fine.
- colejohnson66 6y agoI think the idea is that Ethernet is rarely touched while the USB ports would be quite a bit more. You don’t ever need to access the Ethernet cable except in very few circumstances.