2 ms·
Good answer! Apple doesn’t seem to shy away from “odd” numbers, like 4.5K resolution model I would go with supply combined with having enough supply of the 8gb
by vmception 6y ago
Good answer! Apple doesn’t seem to shy away from “odd” numbers, like 4.5K resolution model
I would go with supply combined with having enough supply of the 8gb modules but not enough of the 12gb ones that it would create strange tiers, while they would lean towards a 24gb machine
- bzzzt 6y agoThey make the odd resolution because they've committed to a certain amount of dpi ('super retina' resolution) and are marketing it as such. While it would be fun to be able to run a complete k8s cluster locally that's quite a niche usecase. There's not much software on the consumer side where having 32gb+ really makes a huge amount of difference. At least not the software Apple is showing in their presentations. Lots of people think they want a huge amount of memory, but macOS seems to be able to handle memory pressure (with transparant compression and swapping) quite well, even on machines with little memory.
- skunkworker 6y agoThey still are doing 16:10 displays. Which I wish I could find more of but everyone is doing 16:9 desktop at the moment. I don't know why it's so hard to find a 3840x2400 24" display.