3 ms·
I'm happy to hold every possible outcome as being open. You're the one wanting to close doors, you're the one trying to realise an unknown into your own persona
by Quarrelsome 6y ago
I'm happy to hold every possible outcome as being open. You're the one wanting to close doors, you're the one trying to realise an unknown into your own personal biases.
Due to our lack of evidence everything remains open and to avoid people betting on the coinky-doink of their lab we need to obtain evidence. Evidence that as of yet isn't there, which is why people still look at the lab.
- newacct583 6y ago> I'm happy to hold every possible outcome as being open And once more: this is the hallmark of a conspiracy nut. Serious evaluation of evidence and estimates of probabilities isn't "closing doors", it's merely applying reason and logic. I'm not saying that improbable or unfounded things are impossible. I'm saying that your demand that we treat "Questions!" about them as "Important!" in the absence of likelihood or evidence is bad logic, and will lead you (and, likely, has led you) to bad decisions.
- Quarrelsome 6y agoI just don't think its an entirely zero chance that the virus has any relation to the nearby lab that is researching something relatively close to what the virus is. > And once more: this is the hallmark of a conspiracy nut. We are done here mate, you didn't need to dress me up as your shower argument, that's obnoxious.