20 ms·
Totally agreed. The "static HTML" part is IMO munin's single most important feature. You can point any webserver at the output directory (or just download the o
by kijin 6y ago
Totally agreed. The "static HTML" part is IMO munin's single most important feature. You can point any webserver at the output directory (or just download the output directory) and immediately browse the contents. There's no need for CGI or any daemon to be running in the backend, which is extremely helpful when you might be trying to diagnose why said daemon isn't running.
I also agree that documentation about the basic architecture and execution method needs improvement. At some point in the CentOS 7 lifecycle, a minor update to EPEL's munin package deleted its own crontab file, effectively disabling the master, without providing an obvious alternative such as a systemd timer. I couldn't find any explanation about why it did that.