4 ms·

I agree; they shouldn't be called podcasts if they don't conform to RSS and don't work in standard podcast apps. They're time-shifted audio shows sure, but not

• ojosilva 5y ago
  Oh, I seriously thought your reply would be that they should not be called podcasts [1] since that's more of an iPod thing. Or at least with the same modus operandi of downloading files (published from iTunes or RSS or whatever) to listen to later. But then, maybe I'm just too old. Or maybe podcasts have just evolved again, and now it's reincarnation is into streaming platforms and clubhouse rooms. [1] This is where the word was invented, according to the Wikipedia: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/feb/12/broadcasting.digitalmedia https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/feb/12/broadcasting.d...
• bscphil 5y ago
  Yep, I was going to say that it was actually Apple Music / Podcasts that killed podcasts, because that was the first site I saw podcast creators exclusively link to versus an aggregator or RSS feed. It marked the turning of the tide, where it even started to be considered acceptable not to have an RSS feed. To be fair, this effect was limited at the time to "podcasts" released by relatively wealthy people mostly in New York, among whom not using Apple products was basically unheard of. Spotify seems to be taking this mainstream, but I think the problem started before they got into the podcast business.