4 ms·

>Employees giving themselves personnal privileges using company resources, They swapped from their work email to the personal email, which indicates, they won'

>Employees giving themselves personnal privileges using company resources, They swapped from their work email to the personal email, which indicates, they won't be working on it during work time. This is an open-source project and isn't the same as adding another GitHub user to a private org or something.

nolok 6y ago
And what authority did they have to add someone (themselves on personal email)? None personal. The one that they had as an employee. Would they had been added to that list using their personal email if they removed themselves THEN asked someone with the authority to do so to add them back on their personal account? Everything points to no. Ergo they misused their employees position.
- pavon 6y ago
  The Linux kernel maintainer list isn't IBMs to grant or deny permission to. The other kernel maintainers had no objections to Lijun staying on as a reviewer, just IBM did. > Would they had been added to that list using their personal email if they removed themselves THEN asked someone with the authority to do so to add them back on their personal account? Everything points to no. What makes you say this? No commits make it into the official Linux kernel without being peer-reviewed and approved. The original change was signed off by another (non-IBM) maintainer, and would have to be signed-off again by Linus before making it into the official kernel. There have been many cases where a developer stopped working on the kernel in a professional capacity, but continued to do so in a personal capacity, and none of the Linux maintainers objected to this. Why would they? The developer has valuable experience and knowledge about the code base. I don't see any aspect of abuse of authority/privilege here, just an employee/employer contract dispute.

4 ms·

>Employees giving themselves personnal privileges using company resources, They swapped from their work email to the personal email, which indicates, they won'

by madamelic 6y ago

nolok 6y ago
And what authority did they have to add someone (themselves on personal email)? None personal. The one that they had as an employee. Would they had been added to that list using their personal email if they removed themselves THEN asked someone with the authority to do so to add them back on their personal account? Everything points to no. Ergo they misused their employees position.
- pavon 6y ago
  The Linux kernel maintainer list isn't IBMs to grant or deny permission to. The other kernel maintainers had no objections to Lijun staying on as a reviewer, just IBM did. > Would they had been added to that list using their personal email if they removed themselves THEN asked someone with the authority to do so to add them back on their personal account? Everything points to no. What makes you say this? No commits make it into the official Linux kernel without being peer-reviewed and approved. The original change was signed off by another (non-IBM) maintainer, and would have to be signed-off again by Linus before making it into the official kernel. There have been many cases where a developer stopped working on the kernel in a professional capacity, but continued to do so in a personal capacity, and none of the Linux maintainers objected to this. Why would they? The developer has valuable experience and knowledge about the code base. I don't see any aspect of abuse of authority/privilege here, just an employee/employer contract dispute.