3 ms·
> towns of that type had to be mostly independent in terms of income for money inflow....small factories, mining, farming and ranching, etc. > I'd say that th
by vailprogrammer 5y ago
> towns of that type had to be mostly independent in terms of income for money inflow....small factories, mining, farming and ranching, etc.
> I'd say that this movement of people who can afford it just another side effect of something bigger.
It sort of sounds like you answer your own question (/hypothesis): consolidation of industry. Which also seems to be a pretty big driver in wealth inequality. I've no idea what the correct response is here -- greater regulation to increase competition, so that there are more smaller players across any given industry? Who knows.
- kingsuper20 5y agoIt was definitely more hypothesis than question. There's always the chance that the past is viewed with the optimism of youth of course. There's certainly a difference in social glue in a world where everyone is either self-employed or has a single layer of management above them. Plus, truly local companies are better local citizens (sports teams sponsors, money for charities, build decent and long-lasting buildings). Dunno what the answer is besides accumulate a financial warchest, live where you like, watch the battle at a distance.