4 ms·
Or they could not hire them at all. This is a version of a minimum wage, and runs into the same tradeoffs between economic growth and social fairness.
by randomifcpfan 5y ago
Or they could not hire them at all.
This is a version of a minimum wage, and runs into the same tradeoffs between economic growth and social fairness.
- scoopdewoop 5y agoAnd who would keep the data centers running? The invisible hand of the market? Labor does stuff.
- qwytw 5y agoThey They could hire a smaller of more qualified and invest more into automation. The only reason Google is doing this is because they don't want to spend the same amount on benefits and other overhead on 15$ per hour worker as they do for a 30$ per hour one.
- gkop 5y agoThey have the $15/hour contractors lugging batteries, hell yea they should invest in automation, but unfortunately as you point out the legal environment does not incentivize them to do so.
- Aunche 5y agoWhy should they be incentivized to automate? That just places even more downward pressure the price of low-skill labor.
- gkop 5y ago$15 is already equal to the proposed federal minimum wage under the current administration. They should automate because lugging batteries isn’t a healthy fit for many of the humans that they are attracting at this low wage.
- qwytw 5y agoHowever working in an Amazon warehouse or a McDonald's is? It's not unlikely that a significant number of people lugging batteries at google would be forced to do that since Google would have no reason to hire them the.
- ClumsyPilot 5y ago"invest more into automation" Like they were sitting there and paying for all this work they could automate, but now they are gonna wake up and autonate it all in a day
- qwytw 5y agoYes, as long as paying somebody 15$ an hour is cheaper.