4 ms·
Well yeah of course. But on Windows you don't need to do any of that. I think that was GP's point.
by noja 6y ago
Well yeah of course. But on Windows you don't need to do any of that. I think that was GP's point.
- levosmetalo 6y agoYou don't need any of that, but not because Windows is somehow "better" but because it's Windows "culture" to package almost all dependencies with the application, while on Linux application use a bunch of libraries that are part of the distribution.
- throwaway8581 6y agoNo. On Linux, the only stable ABI is the kernel. On Windows, the stable ABI and API includes many platform components outside of the kernel (in fact, the syscall interface itself is undocumented and NOT backward compatible on Windows). The Windows platform APIs are very expansive and cover a lot of territory that on Linux is covered by non-ABI-stable dependencies.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- passivate 6y agoHow is it not better for the end user?