4 ms·
Nope, the list is implying that "here is a resource of tooling built for JS but NOT made in JS", not sure where you get the other implication from. Just as "aw
by capableweb 6y ago
Nope, the list is implying that "here is a resource of tooling built for JS but NOT made in JS", not sure where you get the other implication from.
Just as "awesome-lists" about security is not implying that you should hack other people and so on.
I think the motivation is to show that just because you want to write a tool for the JS ecosystem, you don't have to use JS if you don't want to. And I like the idea, I think more languages and their communities should cross-pollinate, we can all learn a lot from each other, even though some like types and some do not.
- numlock86 6y ago> Nope, the list is implying that "here is a resource of tooling built for JS but NOT made in JS", [...] So the list is indeed arbitrary. > I think the motivation is to show that just because you want to write a tool for the JS ecosystem, you don't have to use JS if you don't want to. No one ever said you had to.